[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":591},["ShallowReactive",2],{"tag-perpetual-futures":3},[4],{"_path":5,"_dir":6,"_draft":7,"_partial":7,"_locale":8,"title":9,"description":10,"slug":11,"date":12,"lastUpdated":12,"author":13,"readingTime":14,"category":15,"tags":16,"ogImage":21,"featured":7,"body":22,"_type":585,"_id":586,"_source":587,"_file":588,"_stem":589,"_extension":590},"\u002Farticles\u002F25-crypto-perpetual-futures-evidence","articles",false,"","Evidence in crypto perpetual futures disputes","A practical evidence map for crypto perpetual disputes, separating blockchain records from venue data on orders, margin, funding, prices, and liquidations.","crypto-perpetual-futures-evidence","2026-05-30","Nick Kampe",11,"Legal Reference",[17,18,19,20],"crypto-derivatives","perpetual-futures","evidence","litigation","\u002Fog\u002Fcrypto-perpetual-futures-evidence.png",{"type":23,"children":24,"toc":558},"root",[25,33,38,45,78,92,97,103,116,121,126,132,139,144,174,179,227,241,247,252,266,287,293,298,303,308,314,319,325,330,336,341,347,352,358,363,369,374,379,385,390,395,401,456,461,467,472,477,483,489,500,506,515,521,530,536,545],{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":28,"children":29},"element","p",{},[30],{"type":31,"value":32},"text","A crypto perpetual contract is a derivative that tracks a referenced asset without a conventional expiration date. The referenced bitcoin, ether, or other token may exist on a blockchain, but that does not determine where evidence of the derivative position lives. On a centralized venue, the order, leverage, margin balance, funding entries, mark price, and liquidation decision are usually recorded in the venue's systems. On an on-chain perpetual protocol, more of that evidence may appear in contract state and transaction logs, although oracle inputs, user interfaces, keepers, and communications can still create important off-chain evidence.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":34,"children":35},{},[36],{"type":31,"value":37},"That architecture distinction should be made before counsel promises that a transaction hash or wallet trace can reconstruct the disputed trade. The useful question is not whether perpetual futures are \"on-chain\" in the abstract. It is which system created, priced, modified, and closed the specific position.",{"type":26,"tag":39,"props":40,"children":42},"h2",{"id":41},"why-did-perpetual-contract-evidence-become-more-important-in-2026",[43],{"type":31,"value":44},"Why did perpetual-contract evidence become more important in 2026?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":46,"children":47},{},[48,50,59,61,68,70,76],{"type":31,"value":49},"On May 29, 2026, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission approved KalshiEX's BTCPERP contract for listing as a futures contract and released a ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":52,"children":56},"a",{"href":53,"rel":54},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cftc.gov\u002Fmedia\u002F14066\u002FPerpetualContractsPolicyStatement052926\u002Fdownload",[55],"nofollow",[57],{"type":31,"value":58},"policy statement concerning the listing of perpetual contracts",{"type":31,"value":60},". The accompanying ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":62,"children":65},{"href":63,"rel":64},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cftc.gov\u002FPressRoom\u002FPressReleases\u002F9240-26",[55],[66],{"type":31,"value":67},"CFTC announcement",{"type":31,"value":69}," described BTCPERP as a perpetual contract that references the spot price of bitcoin. The ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":71,"children":73},{"href":53,"rel":72},[55],[74],{"type":31,"value":75},"policy statement",{"type":31,"value":77}," issued the same day describes perpetual contracts as having no fixed expiration date. The policy statement is agency guidance, not a generally applicable final rule, and the approval concerned a particular contract submitted by a designated contract market.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":79,"children":80},{},[81,83,90],{"type":31,"value":82},"The same-day package also included a staff action. On May 29, 2026, CFTC staff stated that certain crypto-asset perpetual contracts described in a staff letter could be categorized as foreign futures under Commission Regulation 30.1 and issued related no-action relief concerning transfers of customer crypto assets by futures commission merchants to foreign brokers as margin. That ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":84,"children":87},{"href":85,"rel":86},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cftc.gov\u002FPressRoom\u002FPressReleases\u002F9241-26",[55],[88],{"type":31,"value":89},"staff action",{"type":31,"value":91},", Staff Letter No. 26-17, responded to Coinbase Financial Markets, Inc. and expressly cites the May 29, 2026 order approving the KalshiEX BTCPERP contract. It is staff-level relief, not a Commission rule.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":93,"children":94},{},[95],{"type":31,"value":96},"These actions matter operationally because a regulated contract can reference an on-chain asset without creating an on-chain record of each customer's position. Product regulation, custody architecture, and evidence location are separate questions.",{"type":26,"tag":39,"props":98,"children":100},{"id":99},"what-is-the-difference-between-spot-ownership-and-a-perpetual-position",[101],{"type":31,"value":102},"What is the difference between spot ownership and a perpetual position?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":104,"children":105},{},[106,108,114],{"type":31,"value":107},"A spot transaction changes ownership or control of an asset. If a customer withdraws bitcoin from a venue to a self-custody address, the blockchain can record the transfer, including the transaction identifier, addresses, amount, fee, and block time. Counsel can use the process described in ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":109,"children":111},{"href":110},"\u002Fresources\u002Fhow-to-read-a-blockchain-transaction",[112],{"type":31,"value":113},"how to read a blockchain transaction",{"type":31,"value":115}," to verify what the public ledger actually shows.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":117,"children":118},{},[119],{"type":31,"value":120},"A perpetual position is a contractual exposure to price movement. It can be cash-settled and can remain open through recurring funding or similar economic adjustments. A trader may post stablecoins or another asset as collateral without receiving or delivering the quantity of bitcoin represented by the position. Consequently, a five-bitcoin long position does not necessarily produce an on-chain transfer of five bitcoin.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":122,"children":123},{},[124],{"type":31,"value":125},"The distinction is especially important when the venue uses omnibus custody. A deposit may move on-chain into an address controlled by the venue, after which customer balances and trades are recorded on an internal ledger. Later withdrawals may be paid from a different venue-controlled wallet. The blockchain can establish movement into and out of the custody perimeter, but it ordinarily cannot allocate the venue's pooled assets among individual derivatives accounts without venue records.",{"type":26,"tag":39,"props":127,"children":129},{"id":128},"where-does-the-evidence-live",[130],{"type":31,"value":131},"Where does the evidence live?",{"type":26,"tag":133,"props":134,"children":136},"h3",{"id":135},"centralized-derivatives-venues",[137],{"type":31,"value":138},"Centralized derivatives venues",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":140,"children":141},{},[142],{"type":31,"value":143},"For a centralized venue, the public blockchain may show:",{"type":26,"tag":145,"props":146,"children":147},"ul",{},[148,154,159,164,169],{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":150,"children":151},"li",{},[152],{"type":31,"value":153},"deposits to addresses assigned or attributed to the venue;",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":155,"children":156},{},[157],{"type":31,"value":158},"withdrawals from venue-controlled wallets;",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":160,"children":161},{},[162],{"type":31,"value":163},"movements among hot, warm, and cold wallets;",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":165,"children":166},{},[167],{"type":31,"value":168},"transfers to custodians or settlement counterparties, if identifiable; and",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":170,"children":171},{},[172],{"type":31,"value":173},"network timestamps and transaction status.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":175,"children":176},{},[177],{"type":31,"value":178},"The venue's internal systems may hold the evidence that resolves the actual trading dispute:",{"type":26,"tag":145,"props":180,"children":181},{},[182,187,192,197,202,207,212,217,222],{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":183,"children":184},{},[185],{"type":31,"value":186},"account, portfolio, and subaccount identifiers;",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":188,"children":189},{},[190],{"type":31,"value":191},"order submissions, amendments, cancellations, rejections, and time-in-force instructions;",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":193,"children":194},{},[195],{"type":31,"value":196},"matching-engine acknowledgments and fill records;",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":198,"children":199},{},[200],{"type":31,"value":201},"position snapshots, average entry price, size, direction, and realized profit or loss;",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":203,"children":204},{},[205],{"type":31,"value":206},"collateral balances, transfers, haircuts, leverage settings, and margin requirements;",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":208,"children":209},{},[210],{"type":31,"value":211},"index prices, mark prices, funding rates, funding debits or credits, and fee entries;",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":213,"children":214},{},[215],{"type":31,"value":216},"liquidation warnings, margin calculations, liquidation orders, partial-close activity, and insurance-fund or auto-deleveraging records;",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":218,"children":219},{},[220],{"type":31,"value":221},"API keys, authentication events, request identifiers, IP logs, device records, and user-interface activity where retained; and",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":223,"children":224},{},[225],{"type":31,"value":226},"customer support messages, incident records, and status-page communications.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":228,"children":229},{},[230,232,239],{"type":31,"value":231},"Official venue materials illustrate why counsel should request native records instead of substituting a public price chart. Kraken's derivatives materials publish contract-specific terms and a historical endpoint for ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":233,"children":236},{"href":234,"rel":235},"https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.kraken.com\u002Fapi-reference\u002Fmarket-history\u002Fget-public-mark-price-events",[55],[237],{"type":31,"value":238},"public mark-price events",{"type":31,"value":240},". Those public materials can help interpret produced records, but they are not a substitute for the customer's private order, fill, collateral, and position history.",{"type":26,"tag":133,"props":242,"children":244},{"id":243},"on-chain-perpetual-protocols",[245],{"type":31,"value":246},"On-chain perpetual protocols",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":248,"children":249},{},[250],{"type":31,"value":251},"On-chain protocols require a different map. A transaction may create an order request, add collateral, change position size, cancel an instruction, or trigger execution through a smart contract. Contract events and state can therefore provide direct evidence of some position activity. The wallet signature and transaction path may also establish which address authorized the request, subject to the separate question of who controlled that address.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":253,"children":254},{},[255,257,264],{"type":31,"value":256},"Even then, \"on-chain\" does not mean that every relevant fact is self-explanatory or confined to one transaction. GMX's official documentation, for example, describes oracle-based pricing, on-chain order types, and keeper execution, with separate rules for mark price, triggering, acceptable price, funding, and fees. Its ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":258,"children":261},{"href":259,"rel":260},"https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.gmx.io\u002Fdocs\u002Ftrading\u002Forder-types\u002F",[55],[262],{"type":31,"value":263},"positions and order-types documentation",{"type":31,"value":265}," shows why counsel may need contract events, oracle observations, keeper transactions, protocol configuration, and the version of the interface used at the disputed time.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":267,"children":268},{},[269,271,277,279,285],{"type":31,"value":270},"For background on how decentralized protocols differ from centralized intermediaries, see ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":272,"children":274},{"href":273},"\u002Fresources\u002Fwhat-lawyers-need-to-know-about-defi",[275],{"type":31,"value":276},"what lawyers need to know about DeFi",{"type":31,"value":278},". A ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":280,"children":282},{"href":281},"\u002Fservices#smart-contract",[283],{"type":31,"value":284},"smart-contract evidence review",{"type":31,"value":286}," should identify both the on-chain execution path and any off-chain component that supplied prices, routed requests, or displayed terms to the user.",{"type":26,"tag":39,"props":288,"children":290},{"id":289},"why-does-a-transaction-hash-fail-to-prove-the-position-history",[291],{"type":31,"value":292},"Why does a transaction hash fail to prove the position history?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":294,"children":295},{},[296],{"type":31,"value":297},"A transaction hash proves the contents and status of a particular blockchain transaction. It does not, by itself, prove why the transfer occurred, which derivatives subaccount received internal credit, what orders were entered afterward, or how the venue calculated margin.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":299,"children":300},{},[301],{"type":31,"value":302},"A deposit address has the same limitation. It can connect a transfer to a venue's custody environment, but it may not identify the final account or portfolio if the venue uses address reuse, memo fields, sweep transactions, or pooled wallets. Account attribution requires the venue's mapping records or other corroboration.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":304,"children":305},{},[306],{"type":31,"value":307},"Proof-of-reserves materials answer a different question. Even a technically sound snapshot of venue-controlled assets does not establish an individual customer's historical order sequence, mark price, funding ledger, or liquidation calculation. It should not be used as a proxy for account-level trading records.",{"type":26,"tag":39,"props":309,"children":311},{"id":310},"what-records-are-needed-to-reconstruct-a-disputed-liquidation",[312],{"type":31,"value":313},"What records are needed to reconstruct a disputed liquidation?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":315,"children":316},{},[317],{"type":31,"value":318},"Counsel should request records by function, not merely ask for a \"complete account history.\" The production should include field definitions, schema documentation, and the contract specifications effective during the relevant period.",{"type":26,"tag":133,"props":320,"children":322},{"id":321},"order-and-execution-records",[323],{"type":31,"value":324},"Order and execution records",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":326,"children":327},{},[328],{"type":31,"value":329},"Request every order event with the venue's unique order identifier, client-supplied identifier, account and subaccount, instrument, side, order type, quantity, price, trigger condition, time in force, reduce-only flag, creation time, receipt time, matching time, status, rejection reason, amendments, cancellations, and fills. For API trading, request the authenticated request logs and response codes tied to those identifiers.",{"type":26,"tag":133,"props":331,"children":333},{"id":332},"position-collateral-and-liquidation-records",[334],{"type":31,"value":335},"Position, collateral, and liquidation records",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":337,"children":338},{},[339],{"type":31,"value":340},"Request position snapshots before and after each disputed event, together with collateral balances, collateral valuation, maintenance-margin requirements, risk tier, leverage, unrealized profit or loss, available margin, and liquidation threshold. The liquidation record should identify the trigger time, mark price, index price, position quantity selected for closure, execution price, liquidation fee, remaining collateral, and whether the venue used partial liquidation, an insurance fund, or auto-deleveraging.",{"type":26,"tag":133,"props":342,"children":344},{"id":343},"pricing-and-funding-records",[345],{"type":31,"value":346},"Pricing and funding records",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":348,"children":349},{},[350],{"type":31,"value":351},"Request the mark-price series actually consumed by the risk engine, not only a public candlestick chart. Obtain the index constituents, weights, excluded sources, stale-price rules, update frequency, smoothing or basis adjustments, and fallback method. Funding evidence should include the rate, calculation interval, position size used, debit or credit, ledger posting time, and any cap or floor in effect.",{"type":26,"tag":133,"props":353,"children":355},{"id":354},"versioned-rules-and-systems-evidence",[356],{"type":31,"value":357},"Versioned rules and systems evidence",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":359,"children":360},{},[361],{"type":31,"value":362},"Contract specifications change. Preserve every version of the trading rules, fee schedule, margin table, liquidation methodology, API documentation, and user agreement that was effective during the disputed period. Also seek deployment records or configuration histories showing when a change became active, rather than relying only on the date printed on a document.",{"type":26,"tag":39,"props":364,"children":366},{"id":365},"how-should-timestamps-be-tested",[367],{"type":31,"value":368},"How should timestamps be tested?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":370,"children":371},{},[372],{"type":31,"value":373},"A liquidation timeline may combine blockchain time, API gateway time, matching-engine time, risk-engine time, database time, oracle time, and a customer's local device time. These timestamps can differ in precision and purpose. A block timestamp is not proof of when a centralized matching engine first received an order, and a user-interface screenshot may reflect browser time or delayed market data.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":375,"children":376},{},[377],{"type":31,"value":378},"Discovery should ask what each timestamp means, whether it is recorded in UTC, its precision, the system that generated it, the clock-synchronization method, and any known drift or incident. Preserve original values before converting them for a demonstrative. An expert timeline should distinguish submission, receipt, validation, matching, persistence, risk evaluation, and blockchain confirmation rather than collapsing them into one event.",{"type":26,"tag":39,"props":380,"children":382},{"id":381},"worked-hypothetical-what-can-the-blockchain-establish",[383],{"type":31,"value":384},"Worked hypothetical: what can the blockchain establish?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":386,"children":387},{},[388],{"type":31,"value":389},"Hypothetical example: A customer sends 100,000 USDC to a centralized derivatives venue and later disputes the liquidation of a bitcoin perpetual long. The blockchain transaction establishes that 100,000 USDC reached the destination address at a particular network time. It does not establish when the venue credited the derivatives portfolio, whether the customer moved collateral to a subaccount, the order instructions, the filled quantity, or the leverage and margin settings.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":391,"children":392},{},[393],{"type":31,"value":394},"The customer points to a public spot chart showing a low of $58,200. The venue says its risk engine liquidated at a $57,800 mark price. The decisive evidence is not the original USDC deposit. It is the applicable mark-price formula, the underlying index observations, the risk-engine inputs, the position and collateral snapshot, the maintenance-margin rule, the liquidation event log, and the execution records. If the position had instead been opened through an on-chain protocol, counsel would begin with the relevant wallet transactions and contract events, then test the oracle, keeper, configuration, and front-end evidence required to interpret them.",{"type":26,"tag":39,"props":396,"children":398},{"id":397},"what-should-counsel-preserve-and-request-first",[399],{"type":31,"value":400},"What should counsel preserve and request first?",{"type":26,"tag":402,"props":403,"children":404},"ol",{},[405,410,415,420,425,438,443],{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":406,"children":407},{},[408],{"type":31,"value":409},"Identify the exact legal entity, venue, product symbol, account, portfolio, subaccount, wallet, and relevant date range.",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":411,"children":412},{},[413],{"type":31,"value":414},"Send preservation demands covering order, fill, position, collateral, pricing, funding, liquidation, API, authentication, support, and incident records, including superseded specifications.",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":416,"children":417},{},[418],{"type":31,"value":419},"Request native CSV, JSON, database extracts, or API output with data dictionaries, not only PDFs or screenshots.",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":421,"children":422},{},[423],{"type":31,"value":424},"Preserve the customer's devices, API-client logs, trading-bot configuration, emails, screenshots, and exported account statements.",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":426,"children":427},{},[428,430,436],{"type":31,"value":429},"Map deposits and withdrawals separately through ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":431,"children":433},{"href":432},"\u002Fservices#blockchain-tracing",[434],{"type":31,"value":435},"blockchain tracing",{"type":31,"value":437},", without treating those transfers as the position ledger.",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":439,"children":440},{},[441],{"type":31,"value":442},"Reconcile identifiers across sources, including transaction hashes, transfer IDs, order IDs, fill IDs, ledger-entry IDs, and liquidation IDs.",{"type":26,"tag":149,"props":444,"children":445},{},[446,448,454],{"type":31,"value":447},"Ask the expert to document assumptions, missing fields, timezone conversions, calculation logic, and reproducible queries under a stated ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":449,"children":451},{"href":450},"\u002Fmethodology",[452],{"type":31,"value":453},"forensic methodology",{"type":31,"value":455},".",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":457,"children":458},{},[459],{"type":31,"value":460},"Useful deposition and discovery questions include: Which system was authoritative for margin? Was the displayed mark price the value used by the liquidation engine? Can each ledger entry be tied to an immutable event identifier? Were records rebuilt after an outage? Which rule version applied? Did manual intervention occur? What data was dropped, aggregated, or rounded during export? Those questions often reveal whether the produced account statement is a complete event history or only a reporting view.",{"type":26,"tag":39,"props":462,"children":464},{"id":463},"what-are-the-limits-of-the-reconstruction",[465],{"type":31,"value":466},"What are the limits of the reconstruction?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":468,"children":469},{},[470],{"type":31,"value":471},"Record availability varies by venue, jurisdiction, product, and retention policy. A public blockchain cannot compel production of internal data, while a venue production may omit schema, historical configurations, or the raw observations needed to reproduce a calculation. Foreign entities and decentralized contributor structures can complicate service and discovery.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":473,"children":474},{},[475],{"type":31,"value":476},"Technical reconstruction also does not decide contract interpretation, regulatory status, causation, or damages. Those are legal and expert-scope questions. The defensible approach is to identify what each source proves, state what remains inferential, and avoid forcing centralized and on-chain architectures into the same evidentiary model.",{"type":26,"tag":39,"props":478,"children":480},{"id":479},"frequently-asked-questions",[481],{"type":31,"value":482},"Frequently Asked Questions",{"type":26,"tag":133,"props":484,"children":486},{"id":485},"q-can-blockchain-tracing-reconstruct-a-centralized-perpetual-futures-position",[487],{"type":31,"value":488},"Q: Can blockchain tracing reconstruct a centralized perpetual-futures position?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":490,"children":491},{},[492,498],{"type":26,"tag":493,"props":494,"children":495},"strong",{},[496],{"type":31,"value":497},"A:",{"type":31,"value":499}," Usually not by itself. Tracing can document deposits, withdrawals, and identifiable custody movements, but the position, orders, fills, margin, funding, and liquidation calculations generally require venue-maintained records.",{"type":26,"tag":133,"props":501,"children":503},{"id":502},"q-are-all-crypto-perpetual-contracts-off-chain",[504],{"type":31,"value":505},"Q: Are all crypto perpetual contracts off-chain?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":507,"children":508},{},[509,513],{"type":26,"tag":493,"props":510,"children":511},{},[512],{"type":31,"value":497},{"type":31,"value":514}," No. Centralized venues commonly maintain customer positions on internal systems, while on-chain protocols may record orders, position changes, collateral, and execution events in smart contracts. The evidence plan must follow the specific protocol or venue architecture.",{"type":26,"tag":133,"props":516,"children":518},{"id":517},"q-what-is-the-most-important-record-in-a-liquidation-dispute",[519],{"type":31,"value":520},"Q: What is the most important record in a liquidation dispute?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":522,"children":523},{},[524,528],{"type":26,"tag":493,"props":525,"children":526},{},[527],{"type":31,"value":497},{"type":31,"value":529}," There is no single universal record. Counsel usually needs the position and collateral snapshot, the mark and index data consumed by the risk engine, the applicable margin and liquidation rules, and the resulting liquidation and execution events.",{"type":26,"tag":133,"props":531,"children":533},{"id":532},"q-does-a-public-spot-price-chart-disprove-a-venues-liquidation-price",[534],{"type":31,"value":535},"Q: Does a public spot-price chart disprove a venue's liquidation price?",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":537,"children":538},{},[539,543],{"type":26,"tag":493,"props":540,"children":541},{},[542],{"type":31,"value":497},{"type":31,"value":544}," Not necessarily. A venue may use a defined mark price derived from an index, basis adjustment, oracle spread, or other methodology rather than the last spot trade. The relevant comparison is between the venue's effective contract rules and the price inputs actually used at the liquidation time.",{"type":26,"tag":27,"props":546,"children":547},{},[548,550,556],{"type":31,"value":549},"A focused review can determine which evidence is public, which must be obtained from the venue or protocol participants, and which conclusions remain unsupported. ",{"type":26,"tag":51,"props":551,"children":553},{"href":552},"\u002Fcontact",[554],{"type":31,"value":555},"Contact ConsensusIntel",{"type":31,"value":557}," to discuss the evidence architecture and expert scope for a specific dispute.",{"title":8,"searchDepth":559,"depth":559,"links":560},2,[561,562,563,568,569,575,576,577,578,579],{"id":41,"depth":559,"text":44},{"id":99,"depth":559,"text":102},{"id":128,"depth":559,"text":131,"children":564},[565,567],{"id":135,"depth":566,"text":138},3,{"id":243,"depth":566,"text":246},{"id":289,"depth":559,"text":292},{"id":310,"depth":559,"text":313,"children":570},[571,572,573,574],{"id":321,"depth":566,"text":324},{"id":332,"depth":566,"text":335},{"id":343,"depth":566,"text":346},{"id":354,"depth":566,"text":357},{"id":365,"depth":559,"text":368},{"id":381,"depth":559,"text":384},{"id":397,"depth":559,"text":400},{"id":463,"depth":559,"text":466},{"id":479,"depth":559,"text":482,"children":580},[581,582,583,584],{"id":485,"depth":566,"text":488},{"id":502,"depth":566,"text":505},{"id":517,"depth":566,"text":520},{"id":532,"depth":566,"text":535},"markdown","content:articles:25-crypto-perpetual-futures-evidence.md","content","articles\u002F25-crypto-perpetual-futures-evidence.md","articles\u002F25-crypto-perpetual-futures-evidence","md",1790145013677]