Tokenized stock evidence: which record proves ownership?
How attorneys should separate blockchain transfers, master securityholder files, custody records, and synthetic exposure in tokenized stock disputes.
Tag
18 articles
How attorneys should separate blockchain transfers, master securityholder files, custody records, and synthetic exposure in tokenized stock disputes.
How attorneys should distinguish OFAC-listed addresses, vendor attributions, indirect transaction paths, ownership rules, and risk-score evidence.
A case study of DOJ's September 2026 Hamas crypto seizures, showing how sworn warrant records layer blockchain paths with service-provider evidence.
Contract wallets and multisigs are not one-person accounts. Experts reconstruct owners, signers, modules, and relayers to attribute on-chain activity.
Collecting blockchain evidence that another qualified analyst can reproduce: provenance fields, raw response hashes, query documentation, and label provenance.
How proposed Rule 104(b) would reshape conditional relevance for wallet attribution evidence: what stays with the judge and what goes to the jury.
A block timestamp is a protocol input, not a certified clock. How inclusion, confirmations, finality, and reorgs shape timing evidence in litigation.
A transaction hash proves submission, not success. Receipts, event logs, and EVM traces answer whether execution succeeded and what assets moved.
Explains how ERC-20 approvals and permit signatures separate token ownership, transfer submission, delegated authority, and proof of owner intent.
A practical evidence map for crypto perpetual disputes, separating blockchain records from venue data on orders, margin, funding, prices, and liquidations.
A practical framework for admitting blockchain transaction summaries under Rule 1006 while preserving source access, reproducibility, and cross-examination.
Learn to interpret a blockchain transaction with public block explorers, from Ethereum fields and token transfers to Bitcoin inputs and evidentiary limits.
A guide to NFT ownership disputes, covering on-chain records, off-chain rights, transfer evidence, and questions courts have yet to resolve.
A guide to custodial and self-custody cryptocurrency wallets, the records each leaves behind, and how attorneys can establish control in litigation.
How Federal Rules of Evidence 901 and 902 apply to blockchain records, with Missouri authentication standards and Daubert considerations for attorneys.
A guide to authenticating blockchain evidence in federal and Missouri litigation, covering Rules 901 and 902, Daubert reliability, and chain of custody.
A guide to proving cryptocurrency wallet ownership in litigation, covering private keys, exchange records, device forensics, and signed messages.
An attorney-focused explanation of tracing public blockchain transactions, address attribution, exchange records, and the limits of on-chain evidence.