What a seizure-warrant trace reveals about blockchain evidence
A case study of DOJ's September 2026 Hamas crypto seizures, showing how sworn warrant records layer blockchain paths with service-provider evidence.
9 articles
A case study of DOJ's September 2026 Hamas crypto seizures, showing how sworn warrant records layer blockchain paths with service-provider evidence.
Contract wallets and multisigs are not one-person accounts. Experts reconstruct owners, signers, modules, and relayers to attribute on-chain activity.
Collecting blockchain evidence that another qualified analyst can reproduce: provenance fields, raw response hashes, query documentation, and label provenance.
Bitcoin address clustering is an analytical inference, not an on-chain fact. CoinJoin and Payjoin can break it. For attorneys evaluating tracing reports.
Preserve crypto-native evidence before it disappears: wallets, devices, exchange records, and browser data, with a defensible hold and Rule 37(e) context.
A transaction hash proves submission, not success. Receipts, event logs, and EVM traces answer whether execution succeeded and what assets moved.
How to identify weaknesses in an opposing blockchain expert report, test its methods, and prepare focused cross-examination or rebuttal testimony.
Why blockchain forensic reports fail Daubert scrutiny, including opaque attribution, overstated clustering, missing reproducibility, and omitted limits.
Eight common mistakes in cryptocurrency investigations, from delayed evidence preservation to weak attribution, and how they compromise a case.