Sanctions and blockchain tracing: What an OFAC match proves
How attorneys should distinguish OFAC-listed addresses, vendor attributions, indirect transaction paths, ownership rules, and risk-score evidence.
Tag
8 articles
How attorneys should distinguish OFAC-listed addresses, vendor attributions, indirect transaction paths, ownership rules, and risk-score evidence.
A case study of DOJ's September 2026 Hamas crypto seizures, showing how sworn warrant records layer blockchain paths with service-provider evidence.
Bitcoin address clustering is an analytical inference, not an on-chain fact. CoinJoin and Payjoin can break it. For attorneys evaluating tracing reports.
The June 2026 Huione seizure shows fraud counsel where to look beyond destination wallets: domains, cloud accounts, escrow services, and payment rails.
A transaction hash proves submission, not success. Receipts, event logs, and EVM traces answer whether execution succeeded and what assets moved.
A practical framework for admitting blockchain transaction summaries under Rule 1006 while preserving source access, reproducibility, and cross-examination.
A clear explanation of how blockchain transaction tracing works, what analysts can and cannot determine, and what attorneys should understand before engaging a forensic expert.
A practical guide for Missouri family law attorneys on how cryptocurrency is concealed during divorce and how blockchain tracing can uncover hidden digital assets.