Tag
6 articles
Collecting blockchain evidence that another qualified analyst can reproduce: provenance fields, raw response hashes, query documentation, and label provenance.
A practical framework for admitting blockchain transaction summaries under Rule 1006 while preserving source access, reproducibility, and cross-examination.
A survey of how courts have applied Daubert reliability standards to blockchain forensic testimony, the common challenges experts face, and what makes blockchain analysis survive scrutiny.
A systematic approach to reviewing opposing blockchain forensic expert reports, identifying methodological weaknesses, and developing effective cross-examination and rebuttal strategies.
The most common methodological failures in blockchain forensic expert reports, why they create Daubert vulnerability, and what reliable analysis looks like in contrast.
Why the distinction between a consulting and a testifying blockchain expert matters for privilege, discovery, strategy, and how you structure your engagement as retaining counsel.